<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chinese Negotiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinesenegotiation.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com</link>
	<description>Negotiate effectively and successfully in China</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Negotiating in China: Basics.  BATNA Analysis by BATNA Review: 5 dimensions of &#8216;no deal&#8217; analysis - Smart Shanghai Team</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/12/negotiating-in-china-basics-batna-analysis/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>BATNA Review: 5 dimensions of &#8216;no deal&#8217; analysis - Smart Shanghai Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=138#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] The BATNA should be an assessment of your present business assessment.  It forms the basis for your strategy and informs your action plan &#8212; but the BATNA is itself an essentially static description or snapshot of your organization’s assets, liabilities, capabilities and resources.  It has numbers and time.  It is a cold-blooded assessment of your organizations health- and is completely independent of the outcome of the negotiation you are planning.  That&#8217;s the whole point.  If you think your BATNA is &#8216;if we don&#8217;t get this deal than we&#8217;re screwed&#8217; then your REAL BATNA is ‘we&#8217;re screwed’.    That&#8217;s the whole point of the exercise – to know how bad your worst-case scenario really is.    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The BATNA should be an assessment of your present business assessment.  It forms the basis for your strategy and informs your action plan &#8212; but the BATNA is itself an essentially static description or snapshot of your organization’s assets, liabilities, capabilities and resources.  It has numbers and time.  It is a cold-blooded assessment of your organizations health- and is completely independent of the outcome of the negotiation you are planning.  That&#8217;s the whole point.  If you think your BATNA is &#8216;if we don&#8217;t get this deal than we&#8217;re screwed&#8217; then your REAL BATNA is ‘we&#8217;re screwed’.    That&#8217;s the whole point of the exercise – to know how bad your worst-case scenario really is.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Survey on Sino-Western Negotiation.  Please help by China Business &#38; Management Solutions: ChinaSolved &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are you barking up the right tree in China?</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/11/survey-on-sino-western-negotiation-please-help/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>China Business &#38; Management Solutions: ChinaSolved &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are you barking up the right tree in China?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=91#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] study being run by www.ChineseNegotiation.com indicates that Westerner involvement with the Chinese economy is almost always through privately [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] study being run by <a href="http://www.ChineseNegotiation.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ChineseNegotiation.com</a> indicates that Westerner involvement with the Chinese economy is almost always through privately [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Chinese Client Wants To Renegotiate Terms by China Purchasing Managers - Renegotiating Deal Terms in a Recession - Smart Shanghai Team</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/12/when-chinese-client-wants-to-renegotiate-terms/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>China Purchasing Managers - Renegotiating Deal Terms in a Recession - Smart Shanghai Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=121#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] Go to www.ChineseNegotiation.com for their take of how Western sellers are handling the renegotiation call. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Go to <a href="http://www.ChineseNegotiation.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ChineseNegotiation.com</a> for their take of how Western sellers are handling the renegotiation call. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Chinese Client Wants To Renegotiate Terms by When Chinese Client Wants To Renegotiate Terms &#124; bestpenalty.com</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/12/when-chinese-client-wants-to-renegotiate-terms/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>When Chinese Client Wants To Renegotiate Terms &#124; bestpenalty.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=121#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] Excerpt from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excerpt from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on China Negotiation:  Interests vs. Positions by Purchasing Managers in China: Separate Interests from Positions - Smart Shanghai Team</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/12/china-negotiation-interests-vs-positions/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Purchasing Managers in China: Separate Interests from Positions - Smart Shanghai Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=117#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] Negotiation China Negotiation: Interests vs. PositionsIs there a link between long-term planning horizon and strong business relationships?Send in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Negotiation China Negotiation: Interests vs. PositionsIs there a link between long-term planning horizon and strong business relationships?Send in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Send in the Lawyers?  Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China by Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China ...</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/11/103/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China ...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=103#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] Another fellow blogger placed an observative post today on Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThere IS a problem with exclusivity and no-recourse best-effort marketing arrangements. Best-effort deals are about the commission. That’s the only driver. If you think that your stake in a JV is giving you leverage in a best-effort &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another fellow blogger placed an observative post today on Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThere IS a problem with exclusivity and no-recourse best-effort marketing arrangements. Best-effort deals are about the commission. That’s the only driver. If you think that your stake in a JV is giving you leverage in a best-effort &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Send in the Lawyers?  Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China by Big Marketing For You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/11/103/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Marketing For You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=103#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onSend in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe main problem with the traditional JV model is that the Western side injects capital and assets NOW, but the Chinese side is required to execute the sales &#38; marketing plan LATER. Unfortunately for the Western partners, the balance of &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onSend in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe main problem with the traditional JV model is that the Western side injects capital and assets NOW, but the Chinese side is required to execute the sales &#38; marketing plan LATER. Unfortunately for the Western partners, the balance of &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Send in the Lawyers?  Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China by Your Publicity To You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/11/103/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Publicity To You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=103#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onSend in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerptEven if it were possible to sue for non-performance (which it probably isn’t in China), this is still such a bad idea that I would be reluctant to even consider it an option. So if suing isn’t an option, what is? &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onSend in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerptEven if it were possible to sue for non-performance (which it probably isn’t in China), this is still such a bad idea that I would be reluctant to even consider it an option. So if suing isn’t an option, what is? &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Send in the Lawyers?  Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China by Online Advertising Live &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/11/103/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Advertising Live &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Send in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=103#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onSend in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe main problem with the traditional JV model is that the Western side injects capital and assets NOW, but the Chinese side is required to execute the sales &#38; marketing plan LATER. Unfortunately for the Western partners, the balance of &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onSend in the Lawyers? Best-Effort Marketing Deals in China &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe main problem with the traditional JV model is that the Western side injects capital and assets NOW, but the Chinese side is required to execute the sales &#38; marketing plan LATER. Unfortunately for the Western partners, the balance of &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Negotiating Types in China Since 1978: The Generation Gaps by admin</title>
		<link>http://chinesenegotiation.com/2008/11/3-negotiating-types-in-china-since-1978-the-generation-gaps/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=87#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hi Brian -- did you get the email address I sent you?  Sorry about the problems with email on this account.  Trying to work it out now, but we're probably best off with gmail for a while.  -A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian &#8212; did you get the email address I sent you?  Sorry about the problems with email on this account.  Trying to work it out now, but we&#8217;re probably best off with gmail for a while.  -A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
